I’m not sure there’s a clear winner here beyond using languages and libraries that are very well represented in the training data. While types can let the LLM t

I’m not sure there’s a clear winner here beyond using languages and libraries that are very well represented in the training data. While types can let the LLM try to solve certain problems on its own, they’re also, as you mention, a source of verbosity that provide more surface area for hallucinations themselves. > LLMs work best when everything for a domain, including tests, is in a single file Context management goes a long way to getting better results from LLMs (why I still like Aider over more agentic tools) and this gives you less flexibility to compose the context yourself based on what’s important to a given task.