4 ms·
I actually agree with this. This will be true, as long as Rust doesn’t break their language semantics. Zig keeps making breaking changes and when they do it ess
by ghuntley 2y ago
I actually agree with this. This will be true, as long as Rust doesn’t break their language semantics. Zig keeps making breaking changes and when they do it essentially means all the pre-trained data is incorrect.
Going forward it is incredibly important for language designers to not break things. It always was but now the stakes are higher…
- piotr-yuxuan 2y agoClojure is quite strong in that respect, but probably too niche for AI.
- ghuntley 2y agoI have been able to create a brand new programming language purely based on specs and the eval loop technique. If I can build an ESO language using a foundational model (ie. no pre-existing training data) and program with it, then Clojure is not too niche.