I guess I don't see which part you're finding objectionable. What you wrote initially was verifiably incorrect. It's not clear whether you made an honest mista

I guess I don't see which part you're finding objectionable. What you wrote initially was verifiably incorrect. It's not clear whether you made an honest mistake and just can't admit it now for some reason; whether you intentionally lied; or whether you genuinely can't see that what you wrote is not supported even by your own sources. It might be possible to figure out which, if you actually engaged in the discussion and explained what you mean. Like, anybody can see what your initial claim was. Everyone can also verify that you've still not provided any evidence for it. Other than the "this is literally how TLS works" non sequitur. Could you possibly be thinking that "logging" and "inspecting" are the same thing? Seems hard to believe. The two are obviously totally different things. In particular, the security and privacy properties of the two would be totally different. If you knew from the start that that the passwords were not being stored anywhere, saying it was "logging" is just acting in monumentally bad faith.