3 ms·
That isn't something Canonical could do just because the software has a permissive license instead of a copyleft license. They can do that if they own the copyr
by bigstrat2003 2y ago
That isn't something Canonical could do just because the software has a permissive license instead of a copyleft license. They can do that if they own the copyright (which I can't imagine they do), but if they own the copyright they can do anything they want and nobody has a say in it. So again it has nothing to do with license.
The absolute most that Canonical can do is start making a fork of the software where they don't distribute the source code. But in that case, the original code is still right there. No freedom is lost at any point.
- Brian_K_White 2y agoThe original code does not matter. What matters is the code for the binaries you are running. That is the entire point, and that specific garantee has far reaching consequences, even if you apparently can't imagine them.