4 ms·
> However, this is a pretty facetious comparison that falls apart when you normalize the memory Why would you normalize though? You can't buy a 96 GB RTX4090.
by dist-epoch 2y ago
> However, this is a pretty facetious comparison that falls apart when you normalize the memory
Why would you normalize though? You can't buy a 96 GB RTX4090. So it's fair to compare the whole deal, slowish APU with large RAM versus very fast GPU with limited RAM.
- Animats 2y ago> You can't buy a 96 GB RTX4090 You can now buy a 96 GB RTX5090.[1] NVidia gives it a "Pro" designation and charges more, but it's the same chip. [1] https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/nvidia-rtx-pro-6000-up-close-blackwell-rtx-workstation-max-q-workstation-and-server-variants-shown https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/nvidia-rtx-p...
- bigyabai 2y agoIt is fair, it should just be contextualized with a comparison of 13B or 32B models as well. This is one of those Apple marketing moves where a very specific benchmark has been cherry-picked for a "2.2x improvement!" headline that people online misconstrue.