Or did you perhaps follow this link the first time: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900207017020 This is the link that is (apparently incorrectl

Or did you perhaps follow this link the first time: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900207017020 This is the link that is (apparently incorrectly) used as an example of an OA article in the email that seems to have led to most of the confusion.