2 ms·
It is really nice, I'm very sad that Apple's RDP implementations seem fragmented and difficult to use. I've tried a few times with my Mac Mini, and it just does
by singhrac 2y ago
It is really nice, I'm very sad that Apple's RDP implementations seem fragmented and difficult to use. I've tried a few times with my Mac Mini, and it just doesn't seem to work that well.
- naikrovek 2y agoThey use simple VNC but with some special “applesauce” that makes every non-Mac client I have ever tried break after a minute or so. But, on a mac, when you “screen share” into another Mac (this is what they call it for some reason; you “screen share into” the remote) it is flawless and quite snappy.
- awakecoding 2y agoIf you want to connect to the built-in macOS remote desktop server, don't use a standard VNC client, use a real ARD client like Remote Desktop Manager. While the server accepts standard VNC, you will only get zlib the codec, which has very poor performance. With ARD, you get a special codec inspired by progressive JPEG, along with server-side downscaling and chroma subsampling, etc. It's actually closer to RDP RemoteFX in terms of performance: https://devolutions.net/integration-center/apple-remote-desktop/ https://devolutions.net/integration-center/apple-remote-desk...