4 ms·
Maybe it's time for a patent pool for non-trolls covering patent to behavior.
by buckle8017 2y ago
Maybe it's time for a patent pool for non-trolls covering patent to behavior.
- yubiox 2y agoI can't parse this sentence. I even tried reading out loud. I thought maybe to=troll but still I can't understand it.
- charleslmunger 2y agohttps://patents.google.com/patent/US20080270152 https://patents.google.com/patent/US20080270152 https://patents.google.com/patent/US20070244837 https://patents.google.com/patent/US20070244837
- herniatedeel 2y agoDefensive patent pools exist, if that's what you're saying: Unified Patents, LOT network, and RPX are a few.
- jerry1979 2y agoI'm confused. Do you mean a patent that patents 'patent trolling'?
- sejje 2y agoWay too much prior art, no? And we want people using the patents, so you'd have to actively troll...
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- buckle8017 2y agoYes.
- ted_dunning 2y agoDefensive patents don't really help against trolls since they don't actually make products. That means that they don't infringe on any patents and thus your defensive portfolio doesn't get to play.