This article is one my pet peeves. It always shows up in discussions as "proof" that 0 indexing is superior, but it hides under the carpet all the cases the whe

This article is one my pet peeves. It always shows up in discussions as "proof" that 0 indexing is superior, but it hides under the carpet all the cases the where it is not. For instance, backwards iteration needs a "-1" and breaks with unsigned ints. for (i=N-1; i>=0; i--) I like the argument that 0-based is better for offsets and 1-based is better for indexes: https://hisham.hm/2021/01/18/again-on-0-based-vs-1-based-indexing/ https://hisham.hm/2021/01/18/again-on-0-based-vs-1-based-ind...