3 ms·
So there’s these things called “trains” and “subways” and “buses” that let you get around without a car. Car dependency reduces the efficacy of public transit,
by danny_codes 2y ago
So there’s these things called “trains” and “subways” and “buses” that let you get around without a car.
Car dependency reduces the efficacy of public transit, so it actually does the opposite of what you say. If we didn’t build around cars you’d still have farther flung residential development. It’s just be close to a train stop so you could easily get around.
There’s really no benefit to car dependency outside rural areas. Entirely a mistake with no benefits at all, because the alternative design that would have arisen without car dependency is better in every way.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]