3 ms·
I think this means you're making the opposite argument that most C++ folks do, which is that C with classes is bad, and more prone to security issues than "mode
by steveklabnik 2y ago
I think this means you're making the opposite argument that most C++ folks do, which is that C with classes is bad, and more prone to security issues than "modern C++" is.
- GoblinSlayer 2y agoMy argument is that C with classes is bad when it uses bad security practice, not because it must be bad.