3 ms·
There should be votes for de-selection through the annual possibility of an 'ostracism', in which citizens could write down any name and the 'winner' should pay
by startupsfail 2y ago
There should be votes for de-selection through the annual possibility of an 'ostracism', in which citizens could write down any name and the 'winner' should pay 95% tax.
- jncfhnb 2y agoOne year of 95% tax is arguably still not enough. If taxes on income were rated by wealth, we could consistently tax billionaires 95% tax and they would still be pocketing millions for safe investment returns
- TMWNN 2y agoYou no doubt thought that the only thing wrong with Maoist struggle sessions is that not enough people were their targets.