Regarding reading all your chat interactions I'd find that a really tedious way to understand what the code will actually be doing. You might have "vibe coded"

Regarding reading all your chat interactions I'd find that a really tedious way to understand what the code will actually be doing. You might have "vibe coded" for 3 hours, resulting in a bunch of code I can read and understand in a half hour just as well. And I'm not interested in all the "in between" where you're correcting the LLM misunderstanding etc. I only care about the result and whether it does the right thing(s) and whether the code is readable. If the use of an LLM results in hard to understand spaghetti code that hides intent then I think that's a really bad thing and is why the code should still go through code review. If you, with or without the help of an LLM create bad code, that's still bad code. And without the code and just the chat history we have no idea what we even actually get in the end.