3 ms·
Hence it would review the data available and try to combine the results into an adequate response but clearly there is some significant issue in combining resul
by ktallett 2y ago
Hence it would review the data available and try to combine the results into an adequate response but clearly there is some significant issue in combining results.
- zamadatix 2y agoThe issue from before wasn't in combining information, it was that it wouldn't have information for the given name in the model and so return a story with made up information to the user. Now it just defaults to a searches information for background information on people.
- ktallett 2y agoIt didn't give impossible acts, dancing on the sun or skateboarding in black hole. It only gave acts that are possible, just not true. Therefore it combined names and acts poorly. It didn't have the ability to say, I don't know which is the most important trait.
- zamadatix 2y agoPreviously, yes, that's the behavior it relied on, why it was broken, and why the article had a story to write about. Currently, no, it replaced that behavior with external information not sourced from the LLM and that's why it doesn't matter if the LLM can or can't say "I don't know": the data for this type of task is no longer coming from the LLM itself.