4 ms·
There's a difference between spewing falsehoods for extended periods of time and then trying to excuse it with "I was joking/lying" (essentially Jones' position
by kmoser 2y ago
There's a difference between spewing falsehoods for extended periods of time and then trying to excuse it with "I was joking/lying" (essentially Jones' position), and making caveats immediately before and after each falsehood to clarify the entire time that you're joking (stand-up comics' standard MO).
With the right caveats, e.g. a large disclaimer emitted before and after each response, ChatGPT should be able to get away with spewing complete BS. At that point, the onus is on anybody who trusts it.
- ktallett 2y agoA disclaimer doesn't remove someone's rights such as gdpr or the right to be forgotten. If the same output happens over a period of time, it's no longer a one off.
- Nullabillity 2y agoWhen OpenAI (and co)'s whole business model is built around everyone ignoring those disclaimers... then the courts probably should, as well. In fact, I'm more interested in why they're allowed to hide behind that defense at all anymore.