4 ms·
> they will have to comply This is assuming, of course, that literally anyone in power will lift a finger to care. I think this is extremely unlikely. In any
by ForTheKidz 2y ago
> they will have to comply
This is assuming, of course, that literally anyone in power will lift a finger to care. I think this is extremely unlikely.
In any case, if this can be called defamatory, so can most chatbots of the last eighty years. It's not a terribly difficult or impressive achievement. It'd be far more interesting if a legislator demonstrated that it's possible to prevent this from happening in the first place.
(...and look I hate chatbots, but courts are obviously not gonna be what spurs movement. That era has passed, I think.)
- diggan 2y ago> if this can be called defamatory True or not, the GDPR is pretty clear that any personal data has to be accurate. And if it's not, you have the right to have it changed to reflect the truth. OpenAI already learned to play ball back when they (for a short moment) got banned in Italy. As the saying goes "when there is money at stake, companies learn best".
- prmoustache 2y agoSince it is super common to have multiple people with the same name, even living in the same area, I am not sure how one can argue that the chatbot is definitely speaking about themselve, a real homonymous person, or a fictional homonymous one.