9 ms·
Yup. Inasmuch as these are collaborative document generators at their core, "minimally ambiguous prompt and conforming reply" is a strongly represented documen
by swatcoder 2y ago
Yup.
Inasmuch as these are collaborative document generators at their core, "minimally ambiguous prompt and conforming reply" is a strongly represented document structure and so we benefit by setting them up to complete one.
Likewise, "tragi-comic dialog between increasingly frustrated instructor and bumbling pupil" is also a widely represented document structure that we benefit by trying to avoid.
Chatbot training works to minimize the chance of an LLM engaging in the latter, because dialog is a intuitive interface that users enjoy, but we can avoid the problem more successfully by just providing a new and less ambiguous prompt in a new session, as you suggest.
- dartos 2y ago> dialog is a intuitive interface that users enjoy Do people enjoy chat interfaces in their workflows? I always thought that cursor/copilot/copy.ai/v0.dev were so popular because they break away from the chat UI. Dialog is cool when exploring but, imo, really painful when trying to accomplish a task. LLMs are far too slow to make a real fluid conversation.