3 ms·
And another headline from the Dept. of Sensationally Miss-Represented Scientific Results. Vs. reality - the ">100%" is at nano-power levels, and is powered by
by bell-cot 2y ago
And another headline from the Dept. of Sensationally Miss-Represented Scientific Results.
Vs. reality - the ">100%" is at nano-power levels, and is powered by the LED's temperature falling.
So, while the underlying effect might have some practical application, this is ">100% efficiency" in the same sense that "turned off the LED's electric power, set it on fire, then measured the fire's light output" is ">100% efficiency".
- nyeah 2y ago' this is ">100% efficiency" in the same sense that "turned off the LED's electric power, set it on fire, then measured the fire's light output" is ">100% efficiency".' It's absolutely a misleading headline. But that last part is a little harsh. The power is awfully low, but someday a partly-heat-powered LED might not be 100% useless.
- proaralyst 2y agoThis feels similar to heat pumps being >100% efficient though? Perhaps a less misleading headline would be 'Very low-power LEDs also convert heat to light'
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]