3 ms·
This one is ever so slightly smaller at 3.25 x 8.55 x 0.85mm: https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/TAIYO-YUDEN/EYSHSNZWZ?qs=AQlKX63v8Ru66vr3hg8chw%3D%3D&srsltid
by Sidnicious 2y ago
This one is ever so slightly smaller at 3.25 x 8.55 x 0.85mm: https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/TAIYO-YUDEN/EYSHSNZWZ?qs=AQlKX63v8Ru66vr3hg8chw%3D%3D&srsltid=AfmBOorQgBwedA_-bfV1WxTlImYyt3nKwOWh_puUl0A8Fmg6hDBbf0ks https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/TAIYO-YUDEN/EYSHSNZWZ?q...
Six of them fit on the face of a dime, which is wild.
- thmsths 2y agoUnlike the FDK module, this module requires an external crystal oscillator, which makes me think that the total footprint ends up being larger.
- teleforce 2y agoTo be fair to Silicon Labs, they don't claim the smallest BLE module but FDK did exactly that [1]. [1] The world's smallest Bluetooth® Low Energy Module, the new model "HY0021": https://www.fdk.com/whatsnew-e/release20241021-e.html https://www.fdk.com/whatsnew-e/release20241021-e.html