3 ms·

Nice model, but strange license. You are not allowed to use it in EU, UK, and South Korea. “Territory” shall mean the worldwide territory, excluding the territ

by sruc 2y ago

Nice model, but strange license. You are not allowed to use it in EU, UK, and South Korea. “Territory” shall mean the worldwide territory, excluding the territory of the European Union, United Kingdom and South Korea. You agree not to use Tencent Hunyuan 3D 2.0 or Model Derivatives: 1. Outside the Territory;

Eduard 2y ago
source: https://github.com/Tencent/Hunyuan3D-2/blob/main/LICENSE https://github.com/Tencent/Hunyuan3D-2/blob/main/LICENSE
johaugum 2y ago
Meta’s Llama models (and likely many others') have similar restrictions. Since they don’t fully comply with EU AI regulations, Meta preemptively disallows their use in those regions to avoid legal complications: “With respect to any multimodal models included in Llama 3.2, the rights granted under Section 1(a) of the Llama 3.2 Community License Agreement are not being granted to you if you are an individual domiciled in, or a company with a principal place of business in, the European Union. This restriction does not apply to end users of a product or service that incorporates any such multimodal models” https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/llama3_2/USE_POLICY.md https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/...
littlestymaar 2y ago
This is merely a “we don't take responsibility if this somehow violates EU rules around AI”, it's not something they can enforce in any way. But even as such a strategy, I don't think that would hold if the Commission decided to fine Tencent for releasing that in case it violated the regulation. IMHO it's just the lawyers doing something to please the boss who asked them to “solve the problem” (which they can't, really).
ForTheKidz 2y ago
Probably for domestic protection more than face value. Western licenses certainly have similar clauses to protect against liability for sanction violations. It's not like they can actually do much to prevent the EU from gaining from it. North Korea? Maybe. Uk? Who gives a shit
justlikereddit 2y ago
[flagged]

by sruc 2y ago

Eduard 2y ago

source: https://github.com/Tencent/Hunyuan3D-2/blob/main/LICENSE https://github.com/Tencent/Hunyuan3D-2/blob/main/LICENSE

johaugum 2y ago

Meta’s Llama models (and likely many others') have similar restrictions. Since they don’t fully comply with EU AI regulations, Meta preemptively disallows their use in those regions to avoid legal complications: “With respect to any multimodal models included in Llama 3.2, the rights granted under Section 1(a) of the Llama 3.2 Community License Agreement are not being granted to you if you are an individual domiciled in, or a company with a principal place of business in, the European Union. This restriction does not apply to end users of a product or service that incorporates any such multimodal models” https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/llama3_2/USE_POLICY.md https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/...

littlestymaar 2y ago

This is merely a “we don't take responsibility if this somehow violates EU rules around AI”, it's not something they can enforce in any way. But even as such a strategy, I don't think that would hold if the Commission decided to fine Tencent for releasing that in case it violated the regulation. IMHO it's just the lawyers doing something to please the boss who asked them to “solve the problem” (which they can't, really).

ForTheKidz 2y ago

Probably for domestic protection more than face value. Western licenses certainly have similar clauses to protect against liability for sanction violations. It's not like they can actually do much to prevent the EU from gaining from it. North Korea? Maybe. Uk? Who gives a shit

justlikereddit 2y ago

[flagged]