2 ms·

Thanks for writing this up. Some questions for the author: Interesting perspective but it’s a bit incomplete without a comparison of various models and how the

Thanks for writing this up. Some questions for the author: Interesting perspective but it’s a bit incomplete without a comparison of various models and how they perform. Kind of like Simon Willison’s now-famous “pelican on a bicycle” test, these diagrams might be done better by some models than others. Second, this presents a static picture of things, but AI moves really fast! It’d also be great to understand how this capability is improving over time.

ndr_ 2y ago
I talk about this, kind-of, in my article about process visualization (in German, available behind paywall and in print). It‘s not rigorous in the sense that I give points, but a picture emerges along the way. Based on the full set of practical examples there, I would recommend the „v1“ of Claude 3.5 Sonnet. GPT 4.5 also looks good, but I haven‘t run the full suite. https://www.heise.de/ratgeber/Prozessvisualisierung-mit-generativer-KI-im-Praxistest-10266093.html https://www.heise.de/ratgeber/Prozessvisualisierung-mit-gene...