3 ms·
> another is to write to people why their insurance claims have been rejected Health insurers are already using it to "assist" their claims reviewers decide to
by FireBeyond 2y ago
> another is to write to people why their insurance claims have been rejected
Health insurers are already using it to "assist" their claims reviewers decide to reject a claim.
One system I saw basically summarizes a claim, shows why it should be rejected, and asks the user to decide if these should be overridden.
- jalapenos 2y agoProbably more like: the claim is rejected by default, then the AI is asked to come up with reasoning why, then review decide if that reasoning is just too silly to fly.
- p0w3n3d 2y agoI recently have put my CV into ChatGPT and tell it to assess my experience according to the position in the job offer, and give the answer in percentage. It said 80%. With small adjustments I could make it 100%. But if they use another tool (another LLM or whatever), I might fail. Just these are those s/interesting/hard/g times everybody was speaking of.
- p0w3n3d 2y agorejecting people's claims when a doctor says it is required is a great example of a conflict of interest. The company is a judge in their own case against the patient. And there is an impartial doctor whose word is just ignored in this "court" case