2 ms·
>Giving money to an enemy of the people should have consequences, even after the fact. That's how we prevent it from happening in the future. I'll remember thi
by anonfordays 2y ago
>Giving money to an enemy of the people should have consequences, even after the fact. That's how we prevent it from happening in the future.
I'll remember this comment when conservatives are the ones destroying something because the owner/CEO/etc. are Marxist child groomers or whatever. They'll be justified because giving money to an enemy of the people should have consequences, even after the fact. That's how we prevent it from happening in the future.
- __MatrixMan__ 2y agoIf what is being destroyed is a bunch of stock prices, and if the owner/CEO/etc. is under fire for using their wallet to disproportionally influence politics, then yeah more power to 'em. It's not about sending a message from left to right, but rather from bottom to top: > Your contribution to politics should be 1 vote and 0 dollars, or else.