>Under closer examination, two things immediately stood out. First, nowhere in the legal documents is Dissent Doe or their website listed as a defendant. Second

>Under closer examination, two things immediately stood out. First, nowhere in the legal documents is Dissent Doe or their website listed as a defendant. Second, this order was obtained without notice to Dissent Doe and the target of the order was never given a change to argue their case, much less file anything to object to the proposed injunction. That's very interesting. It seems like the legal firm is arguably misrepresenting this order ....