> fd is distributed under the terms of both the MIT License and the Apache License 2.0. So not dual-licensed (MIT OR Apache-2.0), but MIT AND Apache-2.0? That'

> fd is distributed under the terms of both the MIT License and the Apache License 2.0. So not dual-licensed (MIT OR Apache-2.0), but MIT AND Apache-2.0? That's unusual. Later: it seems they intended dual-licensing, and botched the wording: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd/issues/105 https://github.com/sharkdp/fd/issues/105