3 ms·
I strongly disagree with this article, I think that the DMA is great. This article, to me, sounds like "oh no, the EU is making it harder for monopolies to kee
by palata 2y ago
I strongly disagree with this article, I think that the DMA is great.
This article, to me, sounds like "oh no, the EU is making it harder for monopolies to keep their monopoly, it will surely hurt the users!". I strongly believe it is the opposite: the DMA is going against monopolies with the goal to allow more competition, and therefore better products for users.
If the EU doesn't get Apple features, great: that will leave space for competitors. And the EU really needs as many non-US competitors as possible, because the US have become hostile.
- alwillis 2y ago> If the EU doesn't get Apple features, great: that will leave space for competitors. I don’t think it’s okay that EU customers don’t get full use of their iPhones for bureaucratic reasons.
- palata 2y agoI don't understand what a bureaucratic reason is. The reason is that we try to regulate monopolies. Bureaucracy is just how you regulate. Are you against regulations then?