11 ms·
If you look at the source, you shouldn't be surprised. It uses a very small subset of what is present now in html. It also made me discover that view source wa
by tlammens 14y ago
If you look at the source, you shouldn't be surprised. It uses a very small subset of what is present now in html.
It also made me discover that view source was removed from Safari 6 (Without enabling the Developer menu) :(
- raghav305 14y agoit's not the oldest website... symbolics.com is this i guess maybe be a replication of the first page published .. or something like that. could anyone please confirm?
- raldi 14y agoYou're confusing "website" and "domain name".
- p4bl0 14y agoI wasn't there at this time (I'm only 23) but I believe symbolics.com was the first dot-com domain name, not the first website.
- ams6110 14y agoYep, DNS, along with email, usenet, ftp, gopher, and many other internet services were long-established before "the web" was created.
- InclinedPlane 14y agoDo you not understand where the web was invented? It wasn't at symbolics.com.
- namzo 14y agoI was surprised the source started with a <header> tag. I thought the header tag was introduced in HTML5. http://www.w3schools.com/html5/tag_header.asp http://www.w3schools.com/html5/tag_header.asp
- stan_rogers 14y agoNote that the HEADER tag here was replaced by HEAD in subsequent HTML versions. The current HEADER is a completely different beast, falling inside the BODY. The neat thing is that, since the BODY exists and there is no HTML node, current browsers are able to interpret this HEADER as if it were HEAD.