Your conclusion makes absolutely zero sense. You are against gas peaker plants (for renewables) because they are expensive/produce CO2, but as a solution you s

Your conclusion makes absolutely zero sense. You are against gas peaker plants (for renewables) because they are expensive/produce CO2, but as a solution you suggest building nuclear reactors (which are much more expensive) and then ALSO need the very same peaker plants on top (or buying electricity, or massively overprovisioning nuclear power, which would be ruinous)?! Running gas turbines on H2 is absolutely possible (there are already operational plants made to run it), and thats a perfectly viable longer term contingency in case the battery approach stops improving.