4 ms·
There's a lot of strange pornography on the web, even if you exclude the numerous Tor onion services. Here is a site that tries to randomly sample and display (
by atomic128 2y ago
There's a lot of strange pornography on the web, even if you exclude the numerous Tor onion services. Here is a site that tries to randomly sample and display (like a proxy, never linking to the source) recently-circulating pornography: https://rnsaffn.com/zg3/ https://rnsaffn.com/zg3/
Observing the stream of images, it's clear that niche human sexual interests are both unpredictable and sometimes shocking. It's also clear that AI-generated pornography is not as popular as you might imagine. Many people don't like it.
- stvltvs 2y agoI imagine most of us prefer to know that a real person is on the other side of an image, but I'm sure there are plenty of us who don't care. In any case, AI porn still has a certain vibe that is detectable.
- crtasm 2y agoI let this run for 50 or so images and more than half were definitely AI generated. Other than one (real-looking) shot of clothed BDSM everything was completely vanilla. Maybe I tried the wrong moment.
- atomic128 2y agoSo you hit a run of maybe 25 (related) AI-generated images that were grouped together. Images are bundled together and the bundles are randomly selected. You "tuned in" to maybe 3 or 4 bundles and should try again, as that's definitely not a representative sample. The stream is effectively infinite and continuously updating. For example, you'll find that elder porn is more common than AI-generated porn, perhaps because some older men like looking at older women. You'll even find that rope binding and humiliation and grotesque obesity are more common than AI-generated porn. But of course, what you call "completely vanilla" is the most common variety of pornography, as you would expect. Obviously that's what most people are looking for.