4 ms·
I don't really recommend using filesystem MCP directly, it won't checkpoint changes so it's easy to end up in a state where you can't recover an older working v
by ezyang 2y ago
I don't really recommend using filesystem MCP directly, it won't checkpoint changes so it's easy to end up in a state where you can't recover an older working version of the code. Use an actual coding oriented MCP.
- rahimnathwani 2y agoI'm going to try out yours (https://github.com/ezyang/codemcp https://github.com/ezyang/codemcp). I already pay for Cursor, but I'm curious. EDIT: I really like the way that each change generates a commit, and that all commits in a single session are squashed into one commit, whilst preserving the hash of each individual change. EDIT2: I also like you only have one function (each command being a 'subtool'), which means Claude Desktop asks for permission only once per session.
- ezyang 2y agoAnd if you don't like clicking, even once, check out my other project, Refined Claude :)
- rahimnathwani 2y agoWow. You should go on baby leave more often!
- dang 2y agoRelated ongoing thread: Show HN: Codemcp – Claude Code for Claude Pro subscribers – ditch API bills - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43356016 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43356016 - March 2025 (3 comments)