3 ms·

> Quid pro quo ... inconveniencing Hitting the innocent is downright criminal.

• mdp2021 2y ago
  So, sniper, any arguments? Now you look as if I denounced a vile perspective and some responded with a vile action.
• johnnyanmac 2y ago
  By that logic, couttries shouldn't counter tarriff the U.S. and take it on the chin. Sadly the innocent are always the victims under leadership decisions. The method here involves angering them and hopefully overhtrowing the leaders who caused this. we'll see how it goes here.
  • mdp2021 2y ago
    > Sadly the innocent are always the victims under leadership decisions What you have stated is that, following your view, "people should impale leaders". > angering them and hopefully overhtrowing the leaders And that you would pester John to turn him against Jack. What should happen instead is that John will rightfully react against you (possibly both of you), with justification. It is very basic lucid plain logic.