3 ms·
I know some of the things they were tying to get, and I’m also not convinced it was as altruistic as that. But I’m not talking about goals. What was achieved? I
by lostlogin 2y ago
I know some of the things they were tying to get, and I’m also not convinced it was as altruistic as that. But I’m not talking about goals. What was achieved? It isn’t safer and the US hasn’t made an ally.
Those things have not been achieved. If those were the aims, the US lost and the Teliban won.
- kennysoona 2y ago> Those things have not been achieved. If those were the aims, the US lost and the Teliban won. That's one way to look at it sure. From a purely force against force perspective though, they didn't come anywhere close to losing.
- lostlogin 2y ago> From a purely force against force perspective though, they didn't come anywhere close to losing Yes, I agree. The US saw this as a military problem, but that was only part of it. Winning a particular ground battle, capturing a town etc was only part of what was needed.