4 ms·
Probably higher cost to send 2 notifications to the user compared to always fsync on all writes in a SSD.
by ddorian43 2y ago
Probably higher cost to send 2 notifications to the user compared to always fsync on all writes in a SSD.
- shayonj 2y ago+1 - I have found its better to instead use it on paths that you know are idempotent and recoverable. Liking expiring data on a cron and so on.
- cryptonector 2y agoThe network is faster then the storage.
- rubiquity 2y agoNo it isn't and hasn't been for quite some time and it will probably remain that way for the rest of our lives.
- cryptonector 2y agoIt still doesn't matter. All you need is enough CPU cycles to send the additional completion notice.
- sgarland 2y agoWith nearly all DBaaS, and _especially_ Aurora, as TFA mentions, the storage is also on the network, so it's moot.