4 ms·
> They could have been rescued, but were left on the station until after the election This continues to be silly. There were changes to Crew 9, last summer, wh
by magicalist 2y ago
> They could have been rescued, but were left on the station until after the election
This continues to be silly. There were changes to Crew 9, last summer, when it was decided that it would be logistically easier for two (instead of four) astronauts to go up and the two Boeing crew would come down with them on the Crew 9 craft in February/March 2025 (that would be now). This has always been the plan, the only politics being injected here are people insisting on grandstanding and making drama where there is none.
You can disagree with the decision (though, again, why), but it was a decision. There was no dereliction of duty, no stranding of astronauts since September, and this was not some high-stakes rescue.
- spiderfarmer 2y agoI would like to see the qualifications of the people who disagree with that decision before I waste time listening to them.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- maxerickson 2y agoIt's bizarre that anyone thinks the emergency situation continued after the launch of Crew 9 with 2 empty seats for their return. It's a simple, parsimonious explanation for everything that has happened since. Nonetheless, we apparently have to talk about it. I wonder how many people expressing strong opinions don't even understand that there were intentionally empty seats.