2 ms·
Compared over Kibana, we experience: - 3x reduced costs - no more index corruption because a key changed type - slower performance for queries over 1 day, espec
by feydaykyn 2y ago
Compared over Kibana, we experience:
- 3x reduced costs
- no more index corruption because a key changed type
- slower performance for queries over 1 day, especially when non optimized without any filtering
- non intuitive ui/ux
So good but not perfect! When we have the time we'll look for alternatives
- kbouck 2y agoRe: storage, Kibana (Elastic) has a new (as of v8.17) "logsdb" index mode which claims to be ~2.5x more storage efficient than previous options.
- valyala 2y agoDid you try VictoriaLogs? It is easier to configure than Loki and Elasticsearch, and it uses less CPU and RAM. See https://itnext.io/how-do-open-source-solutions-for-logs-work-elasticsearch-loki-and-victorialogs-9f7097ecbc2f https://itnext.io/how-do-open-source-solutions-for-logs-work...
- feydaykyn 2y agoStop spamming. You want your product known? Create a dedicated post.