2 ms·
You're referring to this document [1] which has been declassified in 2017 [2] but this 2025 release comes up with some redaction removed - but essentially not p
by kklisura 2y ago
You're referring to this document [1] which has been declassified in 2017 [2] but this 2025 release comes up with some redaction removed - but essentially not providing more information. There's nothing interesting. The document opens up with a quote from a magazine (which people are mistaking for a statement of a document itself) and then goes over into detail of the work that guy has been doing - which is pretty mild. The whole document seems to fact-check the quoted magazine.
[1] https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10170-10145.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-101...
[2] https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2017-2018?search=104-10170-10145 https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2017-2018?sear...
- jMyles 2y agoIs there an easy way to see which of these documents are new and to diff the redactions for those that were already released in a redacted form?
- kklisura 2y agoNot without downloading both of the archives and doing some analysis. This guy [1..6] did some manual analysis. [1] https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902140293794951311 https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902140293794951311 [2] https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902142521175683387 https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902142521175683387 [3] https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902144127107527034 https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902144127107527034 [4] https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902144967197237429 https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902144967197237429 [5] https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902148606355800472 https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902148606355800472 [6] https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902150408996319335 https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1902150408996319335
- markus_zhang 2y agoYeah you are probably right, nothing concrete :/