3 ms·
jaq is nice. It just loses, performance-wise, to the final step in this article, and it can't do the second mentioned workload (yet) so I didn't include it.
by jeffbee 2y ago
jaq is nice. It just loses, performance-wise, to the final step in this article, and it can't do the second mentioned workload (yet) so I didn't include it.
- electromech 2y agoWhich workload can't it do? I've had good success with jaq performance.
- jeffbee 2y agoIt bombs out on the jq program I use for the 2nd corpus that I mentioned. On further investigation, the show-stopping filter is strftime. In the jaq readme this is the only not-yet-checked box in the compatibility list, so perhaps some day soon.