3 ms·
The court didn't rule that AI generated art isn't eligible for copyright at all. They ruled that only humans may be assigned a copyright. If you are a human t
by kube-system 2y ago
The court didn't rule that AI generated art isn't eligible for copyright at all. They ruled that only humans may be assigned a copyright. If you are a human that uses AI as a tool to create something, the door is still open for you to claim copyright as a human.
The court is ruling that computers themselves don't have the human right to copyright. Not exactly surprising.
- dragonwriter 2y ago> The court is ruling that computers don't have human rights. No, it is just ruling that the Copyright Act requires human authorship. Whether computers have human rights is not an issue before the court.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- dpig_ 2y agoWell you misquoted the person you responded to by cutting their sentence short. They specifically said that computers don't have the human right to copyright. As in - the right that a human has under copyright law.
- h3half 2y agoWhy are you commenting to disagree with something the parent comment didn't say?
- OpenLoong 2y agoyou are right