I don't follow your logic here... why would N+1 or N+100 sources necessarily be any better than N? If you start with 5 hand-curated, in-depth reviews picked for

I don't follow your logic here... why would N+1 or N+100 sources necessarily be any better than N? If you start with 5 hand-curated, in-depth reviews picked for quality and then combine them with 100,000 shitty AI-generated ones... you're going to end up with less signal than you started. Expanding your dataset to include more poor quality sources won't make the resulting summary better.