4 ms·
And just as a follow up, it's kind of sad because it looks like you put a lot of work in this. But as someone who writes nothing but Objective-C (well, some C+
by jawngee 14y ago
And just as a follow up, it's kind of sad because it looks like you put a lot of work in this.
But as someone who writes nothing but Objective-C (well, some C++ too) all day, every day, for a living. I would never ever use this. Mostly because it's obvious that you don't get objective-c and are trying to shoe horn some weird javascript idioms into a place where it doesn't belong.
I hate seeing wasted effort. I understand underscore provides nice functionality in javascript land and would appreciate someone taking the time to bringing similar functionality to objective-c in a way that fits and is natural with it's surrounding code.
As this is, no.
- obituary_latte 14y agoCan't wait to see your version. When it does come out, I hope others can be constructive without coming across like a cunt. Nobody likes that stuff, and as we all know, it's not very helpful.
- sirclueless 14y agoWell, it's not his, but http://underscorem.org/ http://underscorem.org/ looks wayyyy cleaner. It's not the basic concept of a collection of array and hash manipulation functions that's contentious, it's the godawful syntax brought on by abbreviating all of Objective-C's types.
- ashray 14y agoI'm curious to know then what your take on coffee script is ?