4 ms·
It would, but it would also decrease the video quality. I'm not opposed to letting my kids watch YouTube, there is a lot of good quality content there, but havi
by pcardoso 2y ago
It would, but it would also decrease the video quality. I'm not opposed to letting my kids watch YouTube, there is a lot of good quality content there, but having some agency in what they pick would be a lot better than the current behavior of short after short after short. Just like snacking on fast food.
- j45 2y agoInteresting points and some things I've been exploring too: Video quality does decrease, and sometimes that's good a good thing.. :) - Lower video quality is lower resolution = less addictive. - Decreasing saturated colors reduces children's brain heroin. (Try to put the tv in normal or movie color mode and see the addictiveness fall off). - Lowering the sound helps kids hear less of the background addictive noises and strain their hearing a little more and can help them get tired. - Lowering brightness can help with as well. - Kids device for viewing could be different than adults to allow filtering and shaping. As for content, I agree. - Recently I heard there's more and more fraudulent content under official channels that includes bad content inside the good stuff. This needs to be caught. - Managing access to shorts is important, if not limit outright. Do you have a youtube premium account that removes ads by chance?