> * No more private addressing (unless you're a glutton for punishment). The question of whether or not you use private addressing is, AFAICT, independent of t

> * No more private addressing (unless you're a glutton for punishment). The question of whether or not you use private addressing is, AFAICT, independent of the protocol. I mean, there's no material difference between private and public addressing. > * No more NAT (see above). Ditto. You don't have to NAT over IPv4, and you can NAT over IPv6; and - you may want to or need to, depending on restrictions on your connection. > * Simpler routing In what way? > * Doesn't require DHCP. IPv4 doesn't require DHCP either, IIANM. But - point taken on the other simplifications!