So basically, assuming no special constructor for array, this is fun all_same(array(str0, str, ...)): all(=(str0, str), ...) Which taking could just

So basically, assuming no special constructor for array, this is fun all_same(array(str0, str, ...)): all(=(str0, str), ...) Which taking could just as well be rendered only using English words for each token: let all-same of array of former eft latter eft more sam sam be all of tie of former eft later sam eft more sam Though "more" could also be replaced with "etcetera" or "etc" or "mo" for terseness or "and·son·on" for something more casual. Admittedly some of these words are not very frequently used in English, but that can actually be a big plus for a programming language keyword. On the other hand all of these terms have a meaning recorded in lexicographic works that would make perfect sense for the context they are placed in each position above. And taking the exact opposite of the approach to carry so much semantic in non-phonetic symbols, that is making them as semantically as void as a space or a comment in code parlance, they can just as well be introduced again: 【let〖all-same｟of(array〚of[former„eft”latter„eft”⋮more⋮]sam〛)sam｠be〗⧘:⧙ { all｟of(tie〚of[former„eft”later]sam〛„eft”⋮more⋮)sam｠∎ }】◼ Ok, a bit far fetched, but it does illustrate well what this reversed approach regarding soundless symbols can open in term of additional scriptural cues compared to the one which also will bind them to some semantic and syntax constraints. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mo#Adverb https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mo#Adverb https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sam#Adverb https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sam#Adverb https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/eft#Adverb https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/eft#Adverb