Sure, and I happen to agree, I release stuff under (A)GPL for exactly this reason. I guess the confusion stems from this phrasing: > If it's MIT, the person w

Sure, and I happen to agree, I release stuff under (A)GPL for exactly this reason. I guess the confusion stems from this phrasing: > If it's MIT, the person who buys it ISN'T allowed to give away more copies for free if the seller doesn't want them to I assume you meant: > If it's MIT, a seller is allowed to relicense under a proprietary license and then the buyer isn't allowed to give away copies I had understood the opposite.