3 ms·
> On the other hand if communication is possible that puts a leash on this dynamic I'm a bit more pessimistic than that. I think the driver for autonomy will
by femto 2y ago
> On the other hand if communication is possible that puts a leash on this dynamic
I'm a bit more pessimistic than that. I think the driver for autonomy will be that the speed at which things happen on the battlefield. People being attacked with automated weapons might not be able to make response related decisions fast enough. The automation will be in place to enable a rapid response. It will become an arms race involving speed of attack and response. It will be the military equivalent of high-frequency trading, involving things like swarms and directed energy weapons.
- ethbr1 2y agoThe phrase you're looking for is OODA loop, popularized in the 80s. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Boyd_(military_strategist)#OODA_loop https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Boyd_(military_strategi...
- dataviz1000 2y ago> Boyd’s Law of Iteration: speed of iteration beats quality of iteration [0] [0] https://blog.codinghorror.com/boyds-law-of-iteration/ https://blog.codinghorror.com/boyds-law-of-iteration/
- ethbr1 2y agoAlso, Patton's classic 'a good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next week'
- genewitch 2y agoI personally won't worry until microwave ovens are regulated. I'm still sore that I didn't publish a decade ago. c.f. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6XdcWToy2c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6XdcWToy2c
- thfuran 2y agoWhat?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]