3 ms·

Because then you'd be running a full speech to text model all the time, and an LLM any time any speech is detected.

elif 2y ago
Uh yea, I want that to happen. Correct. Why would I want things happening without the model knowing and having context? Have you seen Star Trek? We should have computer by now. An agent which knows when to tell us things we need to know, not just respond to requests.
- AdieuToLogic 2y ago
  >> Because then you'd be running a full speech to text model all the time, and an LLM any time any speech is detected. > Uh yea, I want that to happen. Be careful what you wish for. > Have you seen Star Trek? We should have computer by now. An agent which knows when to tell us things we need to know, not just respond to requests. Have you read 1984[0]? Star Trek is fiction. A good fiction IMHO, but a fiction none the less. As such, the writers took "creative liberties" in order to present a storyline for viewers of same. 0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four
  - elif 2y ago
    If you'd read 1984 recently enough you'd know it is based upon the notion of state and social imposed ideology becoming enmeshed, a locally running hub of pure logic is the antithesis of that concept. A better metaphor would be mephi from yamyatin's We (the original inspiration for 1984) which represents the kernel of u modulated truth which exists outside the calculus of the imposed social matrix Hilarious that you thought I'd wouldn't be familiar with the work, when you yourself appear to be that person
    - AdieuToLogic 2y ago
      > If you'd read 1984 recently enough you'd know it is based upon the notion of state and social imposed ideology becoming enmeshed ... My reference to 1984 was a juxtaposition used to illuminate the fallacy of: >> Have you seen Star Trek? We should have computer by now. An agent which knows when to tell us things we need to know, not just respond to requests. Be that as it may, the probability of a dystopian result is far greater than the utopian one quoted. > A better metaphor would be ... Since it was not a metaphor, the remaining critique is moot.

elif 2y ago

Uh yea, I want that to happen. Correct. Why would I want things happening without the model knowing and having context? Have you seen Star Trek? We should have computer by now. An agent which knows when to tell us things we need to know, not just respond to requests.

AdieuToLogic 2y ago
>> Because then you'd be running a full speech to text model all the time, and an LLM any time any speech is detected. > Uh yea, I want that to happen. Be careful what you wish for. > Have you seen Star Trek? We should have computer by now. An agent which knows when to tell us things we need to know, not just respond to requests. Have you read 1984[0]? Star Trek is fiction. A good fiction IMHO, but a fiction none the less. As such, the writers took "creative liberties" in order to present a storyline for viewers of same. 0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four
- elif 2y ago
  If you'd read 1984 recently enough you'd know it is based upon the notion of state and social imposed ideology becoming enmeshed, a locally running hub of pure logic is the antithesis of that concept. A better metaphor would be mephi from yamyatin's We (the original inspiration for 1984) which represents the kernel of u modulated truth which exists outside the calculus of the imposed social matrix Hilarious that you thought I'd wouldn't be familiar with the work, when you yourself appear to be that person
  - AdieuToLogic 2y ago
    > If you'd read 1984 recently enough you'd know it is based upon the notion of state and social imposed ideology becoming enmeshed ... My reference to 1984 was a juxtaposition used to illuminate the fallacy of: >> Have you seen Star Trek? We should have computer by now. An agent which knows when to tell us things we need to know, not just respond to requests. Be that as it may, the probability of a dystopian result is far greater than the utopian one quoted. > A better metaphor would be ... Since it was not a metaphor, the remaining critique is moot.