I made no such argument. My argument is that the claim > These are weapons that would violate the Geneva convention, but we're okay with them to disperse a cro

I made no such argument. My argument is that the claim > These are weapons that would violate the Geneva convention, but we're okay with them to disperse a crowd. is misleading because it implies that riot agents are comparable to chemical weapons. Riot agents are intended to disperse crowds while keeping casualties to a minimum. Chemical weapons are intended to kill people.