3 ms·
I would add that pursuing legal recourse is the only way to reach that Supreme Court decision where either the administration is slapped down or the courts reli
by outer_web 2y ago
I would add that pursuing legal recourse is the only way to reach that Supreme Court decision where either the administration is slapped down or the courts relinquish their Art III powers. Until then we're only approaching a potential constitutional crisis, where the administration has plenty of opportunity to back down.
- throwaway5752 2y agoA de facto surrendering of Art III is the same as the presumptive crisis. We are here, though, it's no longer a hypothetical to maneuver around.
- outer_web 2y agoIt is not in front of SCOTUS at the moment so we aren't "here" yet and the lower courts have not been surrendering to executive power.
- Forgeties79 2y agoA lower court just declared their treatment and deportation of Venezuelans as unlawful and it changed literally nothing. They’re still doing it. We’ve seen this several times already. Unless enforcement happens, they simply don’t stop.
- outer_web 2y agoIs that what happened? I am only aware of an injunction against additional deportation flights. There is some uncertainty about the administration's justifications for not complying - they may be entirely correct that the terrorist designation changes the calculus. And injunctions are far, far from the point at which things are "declared unlawful".