4 ms·
I probably wouldn't replace any of those with a system that excels in generating plausibly sounding bullshit. LLMs are good at processing natural language. I t
by surgical_fire 2y ago
I probably wouldn't replace any of those with a system that excels in generating plausibly sounding bullshit.
LLMs are good at processing natural language. I think only a few human tasks are suitable to be fully replaced with AI. Things like translation might be a good candidate, with some proofreading.
- aaronbaugher 2y agoJournalism is an obvious one, since most journalism today is just rewriting information gathered from other media or social media, the same thing LLMs do. Insightful opinion writers or actual investigative journalists would be an exception. I could see LLMs easily doing the job of newspaper sports reporting, for instance, taking the stats and a few main facts from last night's game and turning it into a narrative article. It just wouldn't be good at long-form pieces that go into depth about motivations and strategy.