4 ms·

Because civilians don’t have WMD style chemical weapons, generally? So are not an ‘MAD’ type risk. Unlike potential enemy combatants. Morality has nothing to d

by lazide 2y ago

Because civilians don’t have WMD style chemical weapons, generally? So are not an ‘MAD’ type risk. Unlike potential enemy combatants. Morality has nothing to do with these scenarios (treaty/convention wise) near as I can tell.

_heimdall 2y ago
It seems like you would agree then that the use of force should be acceptable as long as you know its asymmetric. Am I misreading you there?
- lazide 2y ago
  Clearly yes, you are misreading me. If governments consider it acceptable or not has nothing to do with my opinion. Or yours.